PureKonect™ Logo
    • 高级搜索
  • 来宾
    • 登录
    • 登记
    • 日间模式
Sonali Sinha Cover Image
User Image
拖动以重新放置封面
Sonali Sinha Profile Picture
Sonali Sinha

@courtkutchehryLandmarkJudgment

  • 时间线
  • 团体
  • 喜欢
  • 下列的
  • 追随者
  • 相片
  • 视频
  • 卷轴
Sonali Sinha profile picture Sonali Sinha profile picture
Sonali Sinha
1 在 - 翻译

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Rasheed


Citation: (2018) 14 SCALE 461; AIR 2019 SC 721; (2019) 13 SCC 297

Date of Judgment: October 30, 2018

Bench: Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra

Court: Supreme Court of India

[Judgment Source] https://www.courtkutchehry.com..../Judgement/Search/Ad

Law Points Raised
• Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the Trial Court’s order refusing to defer cross-examination under Section 231(2) CrPC.
• Interpretation and discretionary scope of Section 231(2) of the CrPC in criminal trials.
• Impact of deferred cross-examination on fairness of trial and witness safety.
• Judicial discretion under Sections 135 and 138 of the Indian Evidence Act.
• Balancing accused’s rights with prosecution prerogatives in witness examination sequence.
Ratio Decidendi (Legal Reasoning)
• Section 231(2) CrPC does not grant an absolute right but a discretionary power to defer cross-examination in exceptional circumstances.
• Request for deferral must be supported by strong and specific reasons; mere assertion of prejudice is not sufficient.
• Judicial discretion must be exercised cautiously, balancing the accused’s rights with potential witness influence or delay.
• The Trial Court rightly denied deferral, citing lack of justification and risk of witness intimidation.
• High Court’s reversal was cryptic, lacked reasoning, and ignored risks and procedural safeguards.

Final Ruling
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court’s order, and restored the Trial Court’s decision denying cross-examination deferral under Section 231(2) CrPC.

Relevant Paragraph Numbers
• Para 5–7: Discretionary scope under Section 231(2) CrPC
• Para 9–11: Practice guidelines and factors affecting discretion
• Para 13: Criticism of High Court’s unreasoned reversal
• Para 14: Final conclusion and restoration of Trial Court order

[Judgment Source] https://www.courtkutchehry.com..../Judgement/Search/Ad

Key Case Identifiers
 State of Kerala v Rasheed Supreme Court case
 Section 231(2) CrPC explained
 CrPC cross-examination deferral discretion
 Supreme Court on witness protection in trials
 Judicial discretion under CrPC Section 231
 Deferred cross-examination in criminal trial
 High Court vs Trial Court criminal procedure
 CrPC Section 231 vs Evidence Act Section 138
 Rights of accused in witness cross-examination
 CrPC 231(2) procedural safeguard judgment
 Rasheed case Supreme Court analysis
 Trial court discretion in criminal cases India
 Witness safety and fair trial CrPC
 CrPC 231(2) and Evidence Act interpretation
 Unjustified deferral of cross-examination India
 Discretion of trial judge under Section 231
 Supreme Court on delay in criminal procedure
 Restoring trial court order CrPC 231 case
 Section 231(2) CrPC legal precedent India
 Cross-examination deferral not absolute right

image
喜欢
评论
分享
Sonali Sinha profile picture Sonali Sinha profile picture
Sonali Sinha 更改了她的头像
1 在

image
喜欢
评论
分享
 加载更多帖子
    信息
    • 女性
    • 帖子 4
  • 14-09-81
  • 住在 India
  • 位于 India
  • https://courtkutchehry.com/
关于

I am Sonali Sinha, a dedicated legal practitioner committed to delivering reliable and result-oriented legal solutions. With an LL.B. degree from Delhi University, one of India's most prestigious law institutions, I bring a strong academic foundation and practical knowledge to every case I handle.

    相册 
    (0)
    下列的 
    (3)
    追随者 
    (5)
    喜欢 
    (1)
    团体 
    (0)

© {日期} PureKonect™

语

  • 关于
  • 目录
  • 博客
  • 联系我们
  • 开发者
  • 更多的
    • 隐私政策
    • 使用条款
    • 要求退款

取消好友

您确定要取消好友关系吗?

举报该用户

重要的!

您确定要从您的家庭中删除此成员吗?

你戳了 CourtkutchehryLandmarkJudgment

新成员已成功添加到您的家庭列表中!

裁剪你的头像

avatar

增强您的个人资料图片


© {日期} PureKonect™

  • 家
  • 关于
  • 联系我们
  • 隐私政策
  • 使用条款
  • 要求退款
  • 博客
  • 开发者
  • 语

© {日期} PureKonect™

  • 家
  • 关于
  • 联系我们
  • 隐私政策
  • 使用条款
  • 要求退款
  • 博客
  • 开发者
  • 语

评论报告成功。

帖子已成功添加到您的时间线!

您已达到 5000 个好友的上限!

文件大小错误:文件超出允许的限制(9 GB),无法上传。

您的视频正在处理中,我们会在可以观看时通知您。

无法上传文件:不支持此文件类型。

我们在您上传的图片中检测到一些成人内容,因此我们拒绝了您的上传过程。

在群组中分享帖子

分享到页面

分享给用户

您的帖子已提交,我们将尽快审核您的内容。

要上传图片、视频和音频文件,您必须升级为专业会员。 升级到专业版

编辑报价

0%

添加层








选择一张图片
删除您的等级
确定要删除此层吗?

评论

为了销售您的内容和帖子,请首先创建一些包。 货币化

钱包支付

添加套餐

删除您的地址

您确定要删除此地址吗?

删除您的获利套餐

您确定要删除这个包吗?

退订

您确定要取消订阅该用户吗?请记住,您将无法查看他们的任何获利内容。

付款提醒

您即将购买商品,是否要继续?
要求退款

语

  • Arabic
  • Bengali
  • Chinese
  • Croatian
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • English
  • Filipino
  • French
  • German
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Indonesian
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Persian
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Spanish
  • Swedish
  • Turkish
  • Urdu
  • Vietnamese